<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Academic Editing Services &#124; Babel Editing &#187; philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.babelediting.com/tag/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.babelediting.com</link>
	<description>Proofreading, copyediting, and other services for academics publishing in English.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Terrible Philosophy Covers</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/20/terrible-philosophy-covers/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/20/terrible-philosophy-covers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad covers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Academic philosophy books seem particularly prone to terrible covers, leading me to think that if we can&#8217;t think of a decent thing to put on the front of the book, then maybe we shouldn&#8217;t have written it in the first place. What, for example, does this cover tell us about the content of Paul Horwich&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/20/terrible-philosophy-covers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ouspensky obliterated</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/11/ouspensky-obliterated/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/11/ouspensky-obliterated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aldo Leopold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics in Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh LaFollette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ouspensky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New number one in my list of worst copyediting mistakes of all time: the consistent misspelling of &#8216;Ouspensky&#8216; as &#8216;Onpensky&#8217; in the text of Aldo Leopold&#8217;s &#8216;The Land Ethic&#8217;, in Hugh LaFollette&#8216;s first year ethics collection &#8216;Ethics in Practice&#8217;. See here. I&#8217;ve taught a course based on this book: Leopold is the highlight of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/11/ouspensky-obliterated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The difference between a PhD thesis and a book</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/01/05/transforming-theses/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/01/05/transforming-theses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graduate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wittgenstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years back, I was advised that I should not expect my PhD to be the best thing I would ever write. &#8216;It had better not be!&#8217; expostulated the academic in question, &#8216;otherwise you&#8217;ll never be able to make any progress in your academic career.&#8217; Although in fact this turned out to be true, it was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/01/05/transforming-theses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Bertrand Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/06/22/interview-with-bertrand-russell/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/06/22/interview-with-bertrand-russell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a wonderful film of Bertrand Russell, interviewed aged around 87. Russell lived so passionately, and was active in so many areas of intellectual and political life, that it is difficult to achieve a true picture of all he was and did. One can study his mathematical logic at university (his History and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/06/22/interview-with-bertrand-russell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hermeneutics of copyediting</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/15/hermeneutics-of-copyediting/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/15/hermeneutics-of-copyediting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copy-Editing Corner observes that a core skill for a copyeditor is that she should be able to quickly grasp the total meaning of the piece being edited. &#8220;If there is to be any editing beyond simple punctuation and grammar fixes,&#8221; the blog observes, &#8220;the copy editor has to grasp what is happening in the article.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/15/hermeneutics-of-copyediting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Sense of the Global</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/11/making-sense-of-the-global/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/11/making-sense-of-the-global/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[completed projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making Sense of the Global, ed. Raúl Acosta, Sadaf Rizvi, and Ana Santos, is now going to press at Cambridge Scholars Publishing (CSP). I have a lot of affection for this book, having been copyediting it on and off over the last four months. Its papers apply anthropological concepts and methods to the understanding of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/11/making-sense-of-the-global/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indexing Wittgenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/11/indexing-wittgenstein/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/11/indexing-wittgenstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truly: to know a work it is only necessary to have a thorough knowledge of the index. I remember a Wittgenstein lecturer at Leeds saying how life was transformed after the Philosophical Investigations was republished with an index (the third edition, 1967). Why read the whole thing when you&#8217;ve got an index which includes entries [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/11/indexing-wittgenstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

