<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Academic Editing Services &#124; Babel Editing &#187; bad editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.babelediting.com/tag/bad-editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.babelediting.com</link>
	<description>Proofreading, copyediting, and other services for academics publishing in English.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Terrible Philosophy Covers</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/20/terrible-philosophy-covers/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/20/terrible-philosophy-covers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad covers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Academic philosophy books seem particularly prone to terrible covers, leading me to think that if we can&#8217;t think of a decent thing to put on the front of the book, then maybe we shouldn&#8217;t have written it in the first place. What, for example, does this cover tell us about the content of Paul Horwich&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/20/terrible-philosophy-covers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ouspensky obliterated</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/11/ouspensky-obliterated/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/11/ouspensky-obliterated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aldo Leopold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics in Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh LaFollette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ouspensky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New number one in my list of worst copyediting mistakes of all time: the consistent misspelling of &#8216;Ouspensky&#8216; as &#8216;Onpensky&#8217; in the text of Aldo Leopold&#8217;s &#8216;The Land Ethic&#8217;, in Hugh LaFollette&#8216;s first year ethics collection &#8216;Ethics in Practice&#8217;. See here. I&#8217;ve taught a course based on this book: Leopold is the highlight of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2011/04/11/ouspensky-obliterated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Most Definitely Gone Mad</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/07/15/world-most-definitely-gone-mad/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/07/15/world-most-definitely-gone-mad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warnings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If to be honest, according to the price list of the company I though company does good job. Hence I didn&#8217;t have any doubt about quality of the service they offer because services were far more expensive than other companies. However, I after I placed order I realised how &#8220;serious&#8221; was this company. Thus writes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/07/15/world-most-definitely-gone-mad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does SEO spell &#8216;doom&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/06/13/does-seo-spell-doom/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/06/13/does-seo-spell-doom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warnings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crimes against language committed in the name of SEO continue unabated. At this rate, the English language will be extinct inside a year. A deeper circle of hell is even now being fired for so-called editors who commit SEO crimes. Thus does a certain editing site &#8211; winner of (and, one suspects, sole contestant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/06/13/does-seo-spell-doom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preloved Babies</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/04/30/preloved-babies/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/04/30/preloved-babies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word usage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/04/30/preloved-babies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;It looks like a warning&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/18/warning/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/18/warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warnings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babelediting.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first in a series of reviews of other academic copyediting sites, both fair and foul. And we start with foul. Avoid this site: The Academic Editor. The eye, dragging itself through a turgid morass of stock photography &#8211; in which grinning graduates, nubile and successful, doff their mortarboards to the misty mountains [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.babelediting.com/2010/02/18/warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

